Apple pest newsletter logo

 Apple Pest ReportFriday, August 10, 2007
Vol. 15 No. 17


 

Flyspeck and sooty blotch

 

The two primary factors in successful flyspeck control are the amount of rain in late August and September, and the final fungicide spray date and material.  You can’t predict the weather that far in advance, but you can make an educated guess about how late the last fungicide application should be in order to sufficiently minimize the risk of flyspeck and sooty blotch appearing before harvest, or soon after harvest in storage.

 

Using weather forecast data available as of Friday, August 10, if you have cultivars that won’t be harvested until October 8 or later (risk probably doesn’t increase with later harvest than October 8 because falling temperatures after September slow down flyspeck growth), the earliest “safe” final fungicide application date would be with Topsin M + half-dose captan, or a strobilurin, on August 23. 

 

In a low risk block (see http://pronewengland.org/allmodels/FlyspeckBackground.htm for definition of a low-risk flyspeck block) that date can be pushed back to August 15.

 

If you are using a fungicide less effective against flyspeck (e.g. captan at full-dose but applied without Topsin M), the latest safe application dates are only a day or two later, but your protection is more susceptible to being cut short if above normal amounts of rain fall.

 

So picking the date for the final fungicide application is a trade-off between cost (if a later date requires an extra application) and needing to put the sprayer away for things like making money harvesting apples versus spraying late enough to have confidence that late season rain won’t allow flyspeck to reduce crop value. 

 

So like so many decisions, it’s a gamble.  You can increase the odds in your favor by monitoring the situation and being able to respond if changing conditions call for action.  In this case, watch late summer and early September rain and leaf wetness hour accumulations.  If your coverage is washed off more than 30 days before harvest and it looks like wet weather during the weeks prior to harvest will provide a total of 220-270 leaf wetness hours (especially in blocks with any history of past flyspeck problems), then an additional fungicide application on trees at risk can be a very profitable investment that prevents extensive losses to flyspeck.

 

The fungicide depletion and flyspeck development estimates at http://pronewengland.org/AllModels/MEmodel/RADARME-Monmouth.htm#FLYSPECK

can help you keep track of the situation.

 

Flyspeck and fire blight are like the tortoise and the hare of apple diseases.  Fire blight blossom infection risk develops extremely rapidly, a few hours difference in application timing or a few degrees change in temperature can make a big difference.  When it is on the horizon, fire blight blossom infection risk requires close attention, but for a limited time during bloom. 

 

By contrast, Flyspeck risk develops slowly over weeks, but it just keeps chugging.  It isn’t a problem in most years for most blocks, but when it does occur it can be extensive.  There is a lot we don’t know about this disease, but we know enough that it really should not be a surprise when it does occur because the conditions that lead to a bad flyspeck outbreak are noticeable if you are paying attention.  It’s only when you ignore it that it can catch you and bite.

 

Including calcium chloride in late summer applications, in addition to the primary benefits for fruit hardness and preventing calcium deficiency disorders like bitter pit and cork spot, also helps to prevent flyspeck and sooty blotch.

Here is an excerpt from a recent Scaffolds newsletter article by Dr. David Rosenberger of particular interest to organic growers.  The date table below the article also gives testimony that half-dose captan plus Topsin M is an excellent combination to prevent flyspeck and sooty blotch.  Note that the final application date in this trial was August 31, and that flyspeck pressure (as indicated by 100% infestation of unsprayed fruit) was extreme.  Also note that the “captan alone” treatment was at half-dose each application.

  “In a 2006 field trial, we evaluated liquid lime-sulfur (LLS) as an option for summer disease control in organic orchards.  As indicated in the table footnote, the last fungicide spray was applied 31 August, and protection from that spray was depleted by 14 September, due to accumulation of more than two inches of rainfall.  From 14 September until harvest on 3 October, fruit were exposed to 181 hr of accumulated wetting, and that, combined with some spray gaps earlier during summer, brought the total flyspeck incubation period to 276 hr of accumulated wetting by 3 October.  That total is slightly more than the 270 hr of wetting that usually allows appearance of the first flyspeck lesions on unprotected fruit.

   Four applications of LLS at 2 qt and 4 qt, but not at 1 qt, per 100 gal controlled flyspeck just as well as four sprays of Topsin M plus Captan (the commercial standard).  When LLS at 1 qt/100 gal was applied six times, or roughly every 10 days rather than every 21 days, it worked nearly as well as the higher rates of LLS.  However, other trials have shown that LLS is not very effective for controlling summer fruit rots.  In fact, high rates of LLS (e.g., 4 qt/100 gal) applied during summer may injure fruit skin, and that injury may exacerbate development of black rot and white rot. 

   We are still uncertain about the best approach for controlling summer diseases in organic orchards.  Based on work completed to date, I suspect that LLS controls SBFS primarily via post-infection activity rather than via protectant activity.  Thus, LLS applied at 2 qt/100 gal on a 15 to 20-day interval starting in early July might provide effective control of SBFS, so long as a final application is made close enough to harvest to prevent development of SBFS after the last spray. 

   Low rates of copper fungicides (e.g., 5 oz/100 gal of Cuprofix Ultra 40 Disperss) can also be used during late July and August to prevent summer fruit rots.  However, even low rates of copper may discolor yellow-skinned apple cultivars.  (Copper applications during June and early July will almost always cause lenticel injuries that appear as black spots on mature fruit.)  We are currently evaluating the feasibility of using tank mixes of LLS and Cuprofix during August to determine if that combination will provide better control of both SBFS and summer fruit rots than either product used alone.

   Phosphite fungicides may eventually provide another alternative for summer disease control.  Aliette was the first fungicide in the phosphite fungicide group and it was used primarily to control Phytophthora diseases (i.e., root rots).  However, the expiration of the Aliette patent allowed introduction of less expensive generic phosphites and stimulated exploration of other potential uses.  In both 2005 and 2006, Dr. Turner Sutton in North Carolina conducted field tests that showed excellent control of sooty blotch and flyspeck where phosphite fungicides were combined with 6 lb/A of Captan 50W.  The same rate of Captan 50W used alone was ineffective.  Several phosphite fungicides were included in a 2006 trial conducted in the Hudson Valley.  A phosphite-Captan combination provided residual protection during the preharvest interval (31 August to 3 October) equivalent to that of Pristine, Sovran, and the Topsin-Captan combination.  Phosphite-plus-Captan combinations may prove useful for controlling SBFS during late summer after product labels are changed to include these diseases.  So far as I have been able to determine, none of the phosphite fungicides currently have New York State labels that include SBFS or summer fruit rots on apples.

   Final note: The very best fungicides will prove ineffective for controlling SBFS if they are not properly applied.  Incomplete spray coverage and control failures can be expected when spraying in the wind, driving too fast, using low volumes of water per acre (e.g., < 80 gal/A with conventional nozzles), or attempting to penetrate dense foliage or clustered fruit.  Where SBFS was a problem last year, growers should first evaluate their spray coverage to ensure that the fungicides are getting to the intended target.  The second most common problem is failure to respray trees during late August or early September if heavy rains wash off fungicides more than 25 days prior to harvest.  Given the fungicides that are currently available, complete control of SBFS and summer fruit rots is feasible if fungicides are applied at the right time and under conditions that allow good spray coverage.

 


Apple Scab

Scab control is excellent in IPM Program monitored blocks, with all except one block having less then 5 active scab lesions per 100 shoots.  Scab can reinvigorate as leaves reach the end of their lifespan and begin to lose natural resistance to scab in September.  But growers have done an excellent job with scab control this year, and even if there are frequent late season rains, the risk of reactivated scab outbreaks seems low this year.

 

One way to benefit from excellent scab control is to do a scab index in the mid-September to early October by checking 100 shoots per block.  If there are fewer than 5 scab infected leaves, then the block can be treated as having low inoculum next spring.  The first scab spray can be delayed until the 4th infection period or Pink, whichever comes first, in confirmed low inoculum blocks.  With the increased concerns about resistance and continued efficacy of post-infection scab fungicides, there is less room for error in making sure that protection is in place when significant scab infection periods begin even in low inoculum orchards.  In other words, using a delayed start puts more pressure on there being good coverage and adequate dosage from that first application as it will be the only protection present, there will be no leftover residue from early applications.

   

 Even if you don’t use all of that flexibility (e.g. if you are going to apply oil at tight cluster you will probably use that spray trip to apply a scab fungicide also), it can be useful next spring to know which blocks qualify for a delayed scab strategy and which don’t.  The downside of a fall scab index is that it needs to be done during September-early October when harvest is in full swing and time is at a premium.  But to index an orchard block of up to 10 acres (otherwise split and treat as separate blocks) can take as little as 20 minutes.  Actually, if there is no shortage of scab in the block, it can take only a few minutes.  As soon as you find 5 infected leaves, there is no need to check additional shoot terminals.  Knowing which areas have high scab is also useful information to apply in next spring’s spray decisions.  Recording your observations in your spray record book or elsewhere will protect them from the vagaries of memory, and make them available to review next spring.   

 

 


Insects and Mites

            Apple maggot (AM) fly trap captures in most monitored blocks continue to be low.  But a few blocks that are over threshold are way over threshold.  Apple maggot is a very block-specific pest, so unless you have traps in your orchard there isn’t much that can be said about current damage risk. 

After an insecticide application has worn off (up to 2 inches of rain in the first 10 days, or up to 1.5 inches of rain or 14 days, whichever comes first), clean off traps and begin counting again towards a threshold of an average of 1 AM per trap on unbaited traps, or 5 AM per trap on odor-baited traps.  Continue monitoring AM until August 31.  While early ripening cultivars are preferred by AM, crop damage problems are also common on the last harvested cultivars, as they remain exposed to egglaying damage the longest after the final insecticide application, and remain as the only oviposition target when earlier cultivars are removed from the orchard.

European red mites and Twospotted spider mites have not been much of a problem so far this summer, but mite levels were near threshold in 4 out of 9 blocks checked on Monday and Tuesday, August 6-7.  If needed, Acramite (7 day preharvest interval), Envidor (7 day PHI), Portal (14 day PHI), and Kanemite (14 day PHI) can provide contact knockdown of a mite infestation.  Vendex (14 day PHI) is another option with a short PHI, but a single application may not stop an over-threshold mite infestation.  Nexter (25 day PHI) or Zeal (28 day PHI) are also options where their longer preharvest interval will not interfere with harvest. 

Fall webworm nests are making their annual appearance.  The best way to deal with them is pruning out affected branches and destroying the nest.

Apple-and-thorn skeletonizer is only a problem on low-spray or no-spray apple trees, and in most cases the foliar feeding they do is more offensive to your eyes than it is to the health of the tree.  There was more than the usual number of calls about first-generation damage this year, so I would not be surprised if second-generation damage started appearing in the next couple of weeks.

Second generation codling moth and lesser appleworm flight and egg hatch are underway.  These are major pests for organic growers.  A mid-late August application of Bt or Entrust will reduce the risk of noticeable damage at harvest.

****** Other Stuff ****** 

IPM Program evaluation

Every year, funding agencies ask for impact information to justify continuing the UMaine Apple IPM Program.  Please take a few minutes to respond to the 9 questions being sent as a separate email. 

Please mark your answers and use an email “reply to message” to send them.  Your help in providing information for the annual report is greatly appreciated.

 

 

Harvest weather influences

There are some associations between weather in the weeks prior to harvest and optimum coloring, risk of preharvest drop, and storage problems.  Risk estimates based on conditions at Highmoor Farm are updated daily at  

http://pronewengland.org/AllModels/MEmodel/me-Monmouth-ChillHour.htm

          Dr. Renae Moran and Patti McManus will be providing information for maturity charts which I will include in upcoming emails.

 

 

Honey bee situation

Folks who attended the excellent Maine State Pomological Society annual meeting and orchard tour at Peter and Diane Wallingford’s orchard in July will remember the interesting discussion of the honeybee situation.  Here is some follow-up information from USDA.

 

Colony Collapse Disorder Action Plan

Colony Collapse Disorder (CCD), a significant disappearance of honey bee colonies that may be affecting bees in more than 22 states, threatens the production of crops dependent on bees for pollination as well as honey production. Pollination is responsible for $15 billion in added crop value, particularly for specialty crops such as nuts, berries, fruits, and vegetables. Of the 2.4 million colonies of bees in the United States, the almond crop in California alone requires 1.3 million colonies, and this need is projected to increase significantly over the next few years. The bee industry is facing difficulty meeting the demand for pollination in almonds because of bee production shortages in California. Consequently, growers depend increasingly on beekeepers from other states to transport honey bee colonies across the country to meet the pollination demand.  If researchers cannot find a solution to CCD, beekeepers will be unable to meet demand for this and other crops.

 

The action plan coordinates the federal strategy in response to CCD. It has four main components:

(1) survey and data collection needs;

(2) analysis of samples to determine the prevalence of various pests and pathogens, exposure to pesticides, or other unusual factors;

(3) controlled experiments to carefully analyze the potential causes of CCD; and

(4) developing new methods to improve the general health of bees to reduce their susceptibility to CCD and other disorders.

 

Current theories about the cause(s) of CCD include increased losses due to the invasive Varroa mite; new or emerging diseases, especially mortality by a new Nosema species (related to the microporidian giardia); and pesticide poisoning (through exposure to pesticides applied for crop pest control or for in-hive insect or mite control). In addition to these suspects, perhaps the most highly-suspected cause of CCD is a potential immune-suppressing stress on bees, caused by one or a combination of several factors. Stresses may include poor nutrition (due to apiary overcrowding, pollination of crops with low nutritional value, or pollen or nectar dearth), drought, and migratory stress brought about by the increased need to move bees long distances to provide pollination services (which, by confining bees during transport, or increasing contact among colonies in different hives, increases the transmission of pathogens). Researchers suspect that stress could be compromising the immune system of bees, making colonies more susceptible to disease.

 

The CCD action plan is online at http://www.ars.usda.gov/is/br/ccd/ccd_actionplan.pdf

 

 

 

A very handy book

 

Highmoor Farm’s supply of the 238-page “Tree Fruit Field Guide to Insect, Mite and Disease Pests and Natural Enemies of Eastern North America” has been sold, but Dr. Renae Moran is ordering 20 more copies which will be sold at a bargain price of just over $20 (compared to $32 + $6 shipping if you buy it online). 

 

It wasn’t until decades later that I appreciated why my oldest brother used to buy me his favorite music albums for birthdays/Christmas when I was a kid.  That way he knew the music would be in the house for him to listen to.  It was a win-win situation because I got introduced to some great tunes at a young age (all you Yardbird fans stand up and cheer!). 

Now you can use that strategy to buy this book for that special someone in your family.  Imagine their joy when they realize you’ve given them 500 full-color pictures of oldies but baddies like apple scab, fire blight, stink bugs, and obliquebanded leafroller, along with lesser known classics like pear slug and Fusicoccum constriction canker. 

 

Or you can treat yourself, you deserve it!  

 

Happy Harvesting,                                            
Glen

Glen Koehler
Pest Management Office
491 College Avenue
Orono, ME  04473
Voice:  207-581-3882
Email:  gkoehler@umext.maine.edu
Web:  PRONewEngland.org
Fax:  207-581-3881

What we call the secret of happiness is no more a secret than our willingness to choose life.
- Leo Buscaglia